Dear Mr. Keillor:
I am writing in response to your recent article in Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garr ison_keillor/2009/12/15/cambridge/index.h tml), which excoriated my home church of First Parish Cambridge (Unitarian Universalist), and the Unitarian Universalist faith in general.
I have been a loyal listener of Prairie Home Companion since you first went on the air in the 1970s. I have always loved listening to the News from Lake Wobegon, the gentle and forgiving and open-eyed way that you described the imperfect and well-meaning individuals from a small town in Minnesota that seems to resemble your own. I listen to the Writer's Almanac every day. In many ways, your soothing voice and gentle words have followed me all the days of my life. I have dwelt in the house of public radio my whole life long. Your work has been a source of comfort and inspiration to me since I was a small child.
That is why your recent article was particularly dismaying and disappointing to me. I am not angry about what you wrote, Mr. Keillor, just very, very hurt.
In one of your stories, you describe a young man who is a dancer in New York City. In this story, you describe how much easier his life would be if he were desperately attracted to the woman who shared his apartment. But he is not attracted to women. You go on to say, "his life would also have been easier if he were a lawyer." Like that dancer in New York, that young man of whom you spoke with such affection and compassion, I did not choose to be the woman that I am today. I have, however, come to a level of acceptance about it, and to realize that I deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.
As I grew into a young woman, I discovered some things about myself that have been very hard for me -- and many people -- to accept. I am a bisexual woman, and I am a witch. Neither of these things did I choose for myself, anymore than I chose to be born in California and raised on the East Coast. These labels do not define me, but they are a part of my identity, just as much as my blue eyes and my talent for writing and my love for Prairie Home Companion.
After leaving the Catholic Church of my birth, and after many years of practicing my beliefs in private and seeking a spiritual home, I became a member of First Parish Cambridge. I joined a Unitarian Universalist congregation because it was the only church that would take a witch as a member. I discovered for the first time in my life a vibrant, organized, active community of people with deeply held beliefs that I shared. These beliefs and their creed may be different than yours, but they are beliefs nonetheless. They deserve to be treated with the same respect as those of mainstream Christianity, of Judaism, of Islam.
UUs care passionately about things like social justice, the inherent worth and dignity of all people, the interconnected web of existence, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning. Do not mistake our aversion to written dogma for wishy-washiness. Wishy-washy people do not work for the survival of Jews in Nazi-occupied Germany (http://www.uusc.org/history). They do not face criminal charges to keep people from dying of thirst in the desert (http://www.uuctucson.org/index.php/soc ial-action/no-more-deaths-no-mas-muertes.h tml). They do not face violence and death in their own houses of worship (http://www.knoxnews.com/news/news/loca l/knoxville-unitarian-church-shooting/) .
You accuse us of having no creed. Our seven principles and six sources are even easier to understand than the Nicene or Apostle's creed. Here they are for your reading pleasure: http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml
One of the most hurtful things you said in your article, Mr. Keillor, was that Christmas is a Christian holiday, and that if we don't like it, we should go off and celebrate another one. Christmas is a part of my cultural heritage, and I refuse to abandon it to bigots and dogmatists. If you go back and read your history, you will see that most of modern Christmas traditions date back only to the Victorian era. Good Yankee Congregationalists and Calvinists like the Rev. Lyman Beecher refused to celebrate Christmas because there was no Biblical evidence to suggest that Jesus was born around the time of the Winter Solstice. Church reformers also repudiated the pagan origins of most of the Christmas traditions, including the Christmas tree, Christmas caroling, the exchange of gifts, and the Yule log. Modern Christians have similar protestations about Halloween (see here: http://www.christiananswers.net/q-e den/halloween.html)
According to many Biblical scholars, it's much more likely that Jesus was born in the spring. But there's already another big Christian festival at that time of year. Perhaps you've heard of it. It's called Easter (from the German Ostara), a holiday that, like its pagan predecessors, celebrates life, death, and rebirth with the coming of the spring. Easter is also full of traditions that date back to its earlier pagan origins. I, for one, am not going to deny my children the pleasure of an Easter egg hunt in the service of theological purity.
Religion, like all of human experience and culture, is constantly evolving. As a Protestant, you should be well aware of how much your version of Christianity differs from that of Rome. And religious tolerance has always been one of the bedrocks upon which American society has rested. Please don't fall into the same trap that Rev. Fred Phelps did (http://www.godhatesfags.com/). As a Christian who celebrates the birth of your Lord Savior Jesus Christ, you are no doubt aware of these words from the Book of Peter:
I will not repay your insult with more insults, but this blessing and this prayer: that you be treated with the same kindness, tolerance, and forbearance that all beings deserve.
Mr. Keillor, I am writing you this letter because I wanted to let you know about the long-standing relationship I have had with your work and your show. I realize that this is a one-sided relationship. You have never met me. We have never been friends. And yet we still have a relationship. I would hate to see that relationship damaged because of a few careless words. I find it difficult to listen to the Writer's Almanac these days. I'm not sure that I will be able to continue my support of Prairie Home Companion. I have done what I can to repair this relationship. I can only hope that you care enough about your fans that you will do what you can to repair it as well.
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
In love and compassion,
Frances Donovan
I am writing in response to your recent article in Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garr
I have been a loyal listener of Prairie Home Companion since you first went on the air in the 1970s. I have always loved listening to the News from Lake Wobegon, the gentle and forgiving and open-eyed way that you described the imperfect and well-meaning individuals from a small town in Minnesota that seems to resemble your own. I listen to the Writer's Almanac every day. In many ways, your soothing voice and gentle words have followed me all the days of my life. I have dwelt in the house of public radio my whole life long. Your work has been a source of comfort and inspiration to me since I was a small child.
That is why your recent article was particularly dismaying and disappointing to me. I am not angry about what you wrote, Mr. Keillor, just very, very hurt.
In one of your stories, you describe a young man who is a dancer in New York City. In this story, you describe how much easier his life would be if he were desperately attracted to the woman who shared his apartment. But he is not attracted to women. You go on to say, "his life would also have been easier if he were a lawyer." Like that dancer in New York, that young man of whom you spoke with such affection and compassion, I did not choose to be the woman that I am today. I have, however, come to a level of acceptance about it, and to realize that I deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.
As I grew into a young woman, I discovered some things about myself that have been very hard for me -- and many people -- to accept. I am a bisexual woman, and I am a witch. Neither of these things did I choose for myself, anymore than I chose to be born in California and raised on the East Coast. These labels do not define me, but they are a part of my identity, just as much as my blue eyes and my talent for writing and my love for Prairie Home Companion.
After leaving the Catholic Church of my birth, and after many years of practicing my beliefs in private and seeking a spiritual home, I became a member of First Parish Cambridge. I joined a Unitarian Universalist congregation because it was the only church that would take a witch as a member. I discovered for the first time in my life a vibrant, organized, active community of people with deeply held beliefs that I shared. These beliefs and their creed may be different than yours, but they are beliefs nonetheless. They deserve to be treated with the same respect as those of mainstream Christianity, of Judaism, of Islam.
UUs care passionately about things like social justice, the inherent worth and dignity of all people, the interconnected web of existence, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning. Do not mistake our aversion to written dogma for wishy-washiness. Wishy-washy people do not work for the survival of Jews in Nazi-occupied Germany (http://www.uusc.org/history). They do not face criminal charges to keep people from dying of thirst in the desert (http://www.uuctucson.org/index.php/soc
You accuse us of having no creed. Our seven principles and six sources are even easier to understand than the Nicene or Apostle's creed. Here they are for your reading pleasure: http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml
One of the most hurtful things you said in your article, Mr. Keillor, was that Christmas is a Christian holiday, and that if we don't like it, we should go off and celebrate another one. Christmas is a part of my cultural heritage, and I refuse to abandon it to bigots and dogmatists. If you go back and read your history, you will see that most of modern Christmas traditions date back only to the Victorian era. Good Yankee Congregationalists and Calvinists like the Rev. Lyman Beecher refused to celebrate Christmas because there was no Biblical evidence to suggest that Jesus was born around the time of the Winter Solstice. Church reformers also repudiated the pagan origins of most of the Christmas traditions, including the Christmas tree, Christmas caroling, the exchange of gifts, and the Yule log. Modern Christians have similar protestations about Halloween (see here: http://www.christiananswers.net/q-e
According to many Biblical scholars, it's much more likely that Jesus was born in the spring. But there's already another big Christian festival at that time of year. Perhaps you've heard of it. It's called Easter (from the German Ostara), a holiday that, like its pagan predecessors, celebrates life, death, and rebirth with the coming of the spring. Easter is also full of traditions that date back to its earlier pagan origins. I, for one, am not going to deny my children the pleasure of an Easter egg hunt in the service of theological purity.
Religion, like all of human experience and culture, is constantly evolving. As a Protestant, you should be well aware of how much your version of Christianity differs from that of Rome. And religious tolerance has always been one of the bedrocks upon which American society has rested. Please don't fall into the same trap that Rev. Fred Phelps did (http://www.godhatesfags.com/). As a Christian who celebrates the birth of your Lord Savior Jesus Christ, you are no doubt aware of these words from the Book of Peter:
Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous. Do not repay evil for evil or abuse for abuse; but, on the contrary, repay with a blessing.
1 Peter 3:8-9
I will not repay your insult with more insults, but this blessing and this prayer: that you be treated with the same kindness, tolerance, and forbearance that all beings deserve.
Mr. Keillor, I am writing you this letter because I wanted to let you know about the long-standing relationship I have had with your work and your show. I realize that this is a one-sided relationship. You have never met me. We have never been friends. And yet we still have a relationship. I would hate to see that relationship damaged because of a few careless words. I find it difficult to listen to the Writer's Almanac these days. I'm not sure that I will be able to continue my support of Prairie Home Companion. I have done what I can to repair this relationship. I can only hope that you care enough about your fans that you will do what you can to repair it as well.
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
In love and compassion,
Frances Donovan
- Location:La Officina de Casa
- Mood:
hurt - Music:Prairie Home Companion
- Had a good, productive day at the (home) office. Killer cramps meant I didn't feel like a human being until around 10am, but thanks to the miracle of technology (if we don't understand how it works, does that mean it's magic?) I still started working before 8am. Of course, now I feel like I need to get just one more thing done before I can go, er, home.
- I've lined up an editor for my
newfirstchapbook. This is good because it'll never get published unless I have deadlines. I can has deadlines? - From our email exchange about the book:
ME: I'd like to get it out before December and the holidays -- it might make a nice gift to some folks, unless it's super-tacky to send off your own poetry as a gift.
HIM: I don't think it's at all tacky - either that, or I'm the tackiest mofo around. - I'm leading the annual open circle of the Women's Sacred Circle at First Parish Cambridge (UU). This is, I believe, my second or third year on the leadership council for the group. Our official church liason/fearless leader has been in the job for about three years. No one wants to take it over from her (especially me) because it involves sitting through interminable Program Council meetings where they debate things like where the table for the group raising money for the thing should go next Sunday. She's very happy, however, that I've taken over most of the planning of the actual open circle. We only open to new members once a year. Usually we get a pretty sizable number of newcomers in October, but not everyone stays. It's always a challenge making sure everyone feels welcome. By the end of the year, we all know each other really well. But it's only this year that I really feel like I'm deeply rooted in the group. It's like all kinds of family: sometimes they annoy the crap out of you, but you still love them.
- Army Guy,
mellowtron, and I went to see Neal Stephenson read from his new book Anathem last Saturday. The Harvard Bookstore put it on -- in my church, because my church is just that cool. I was the first one up in line and asked him a question about Snow Crash. In the back the book, he mentions that the book was originally conceived as a graphic novel and I wanted to know whether he'd ever done any other collaborations. In short, no.
The crowd was super-nerd-a-licious, which made the premise of the book (a monastic "mathic" order that studiously avoids exposure to ephemeral technology in pursuit of more eternal truths) that much more apropos. Behind me, kids were talking about Facebook and Netflix. Ten years ago it would have been about iVillage and About.com.
Two great questions: one about some kind of nerd religious movement called "The Singularity." Apparently, some dude is predicting there will be a Rapture of the Nerds, where we all transcend our bodies and upload ourselves into entirely digital spaces. Sounds about as likely as Gabriel blowin' his horn and the dead rising up from their graves. What I want to know is, who's going to maintain the servers? The rest of us, I guess, who'll be stuck behind reading old books and playing with ham radios.
Best question EVAR, though: "If you had to choose just one, would you teach your children to type or to write cursive?" The poor man was stumped. For a minute. Then he chose cursive, "on the theory that handwriting recognition will improve enough to recognize cursive."
My cursive is completely illegible. Of course, so is most of my printed handwriting.
- Location:La Officina de Casa
- Mood:
content - Music:Nighttime traffic
I came across the activist group Faithful America a while ago and really appreciate the message they stand for. Political discourse in this country around religion has been very much shaped by the religious right. Faithful America aims to reshape the discourse to include members of more liberal religious traditions. Their latest campaign is to shape some of the debate happening during this year's presidential campaign. There's a "compassion forum" live on CNN this Sunday at 8pm. You should vote on which issue to have the candidates address: click here to do that.
Whenever I talk to someone new, I feel self-conscious saying things like "I know her from church" or "I do lay ministry," because as soon as people hear the word "church" slip from my lips I know they're making all kinds of assumptions about my religion, my politics, and my beliefs. For the record (are the new viewers gone yet?), I have been a practicing witch for more than a decade. Most of that time I spent as a solitary practitioner, although I did study with a coven in Connecticut and also ran a website for About.com on the subject that included virtual ritual in chat rooms (not to mention mountains and mountains of emails, and thetime-sink-hole morass of bitchy pagans forum). I belong to First Parish Cambridge, a Unitarian Universalist church in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Years before I attended a Sunday service at the church, some friends of mine introduced me to the CUUPs rituals that take place on Fridays near the Sabbats of Yule, Imbolc, Ostara, and sometimes Samhain. I appreciated CUUPs's eclectic approach to pagan practice and was also impressed with the depth and breadth of knowledge possessed by the facilitators.
While the notion of a liberal religious tradition is not entirely new to me, my experience at First Parish Cambridge really was life-changing. To steal the words of my ex-girlfriend, it was an important part of my re-churching. It wasn't until Sunday services at First Parish that I actually heard the man up in the pulpit saying the exact same things I believed. The words in the hymnals weren't full of things about Jesus, only-begotten Son of the Father saving us from eternal damnation. They were about a hard-working Mother God, a loving Father God, a Spirit of Life that imbues us all. Instead of the "thou shalt nots" of the 10 Commandments, the seven principles talked about things like the inherent worth and dignity of all human beings, the importance of social justice, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning.
People like to make fun of the UUs for having wishy-washy beliefs. At the beginning, I used to laugh along with those jokes. But I don't anymore, because I see the Unitarian Universalist movement as a group of people with very deeply held beliefs. They're beliefs not based in shame however, but in the irrepressible presence of the Divine in all aspects of existence: in human beings, in society, in the earth itself. People need deeply held beliefs to fight the genocide of the Jews in Nazi Germany, or speak out against the excesses of the McCarthy era, or take practical steps to fight racism, or get arrested protesting the genocide in the Sudan, or support the rights of gay families to equal treatment under the law.
The UU tradition allows for a heterogeneity of beliefs that includes secular humanists, deists, Buddhists, "Jew-U's", pagans, Christians, and others. It also has something sadly missing in the Catholic church of my youth: democratic governance. All members of a congregation have a say in how the congregation is run, and all matters of theology and the like come up before the General Assembly each year. Ministers don't get any more say in the running of the church than lay people.
I never expected to find a congregation that so completely shared the same views as me, and certainly not one as active, welcoming, and thriving as First Parish Cambridge. As a result, I give back a great deal to the church, both with an annual pledge and with a fair amount of lay ministry. I'm co-leading a Sunday service for Beltane this year on May 4. If you're in the neighborhood and would like to hear me preach, please come by. It's the second lay-led service the Women's Sacred Circle has done in the past 12 months, and I hope there will be more to follow.
Whenever I talk to someone new, I feel self-conscious saying things like "I know her from church" or "I do lay ministry," because as soon as people hear the word "church" slip from my lips I know they're making all kinds of assumptions about my religion, my politics, and my beliefs. For the record (are the new viewers gone yet?), I have been a practicing witch for more than a decade. Most of that time I spent as a solitary practitioner, although I did study with a coven in Connecticut and also ran a website for About.com on the subject that included virtual ritual in chat rooms (not to mention mountains and mountains of emails, and the
While the notion of a liberal religious tradition is not entirely new to me, my experience at First Parish Cambridge really was life-changing. To steal the words of my ex-girlfriend, it was an important part of my re-churching. It wasn't until Sunday services at First Parish that I actually heard the man up in the pulpit saying the exact same things I believed. The words in the hymnals weren't full of things about Jesus, only-begotten Son of the Father saving us from eternal damnation. They were about a hard-working Mother God, a loving Father God, a Spirit of Life that imbues us all. Instead of the "thou shalt nots" of the 10 Commandments, the seven principles talked about things like the inherent worth and dignity of all human beings, the importance of social justice, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning.
People like to make fun of the UUs for having wishy-washy beliefs. At the beginning, I used to laugh along with those jokes. But I don't anymore, because I see the Unitarian Universalist movement as a group of people with very deeply held beliefs. They're beliefs not based in shame however, but in the irrepressible presence of the Divine in all aspects of existence: in human beings, in society, in the earth itself. People need deeply held beliefs to fight the genocide of the Jews in Nazi Germany, or speak out against the excesses of the McCarthy era, or take practical steps to fight racism, or get arrested protesting the genocide in the Sudan, or support the rights of gay families to equal treatment under the law.
The UU tradition allows for a heterogeneity of beliefs that includes secular humanists, deists, Buddhists, "Jew-U's", pagans, Christians, and others. It also has something sadly missing in the Catholic church of my youth: democratic governance. All members of a congregation have a say in how the congregation is run, and all matters of theology and the like come up before the General Assembly each year. Ministers don't get any more say in the running of the church than lay people.
I never expected to find a congregation that so completely shared the same views as me, and certainly not one as active, welcoming, and thriving as First Parish Cambridge. As a result, I give back a great deal to the church, both with an annual pledge and with a fair amount of lay ministry. I'm co-leading a Sunday service for Beltane this year on May 4. If you're in the neighborhood and would like to hear me preach, please come by. It's the second lay-led service the Women's Sacred Circle has done in the past 12 months, and I hope there will be more to follow.
- Mood:
determined
