Home

Open letter to Garrison Keillor

  • Dec. 20th, 2009 at 2:05 PM
san fransico the homeland
Dear Mr. Keillor:

I am writing in response to your recent article in Salon.com (http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garrison_keillor/2009/12/15/cambridge/index.html), which excoriated my home church of First Parish Cambridge (Unitarian Universalist), and the Unitarian Universalist faith in general.

I have been a loyal listener of Prairie Home Companion since you first went on the air in the 1970s. I have always loved listening to the News from Lake Wobegon, the gentle and forgiving and open-eyed way that you described the imperfect and well-meaning individuals from a small town in Minnesota that seems to resemble your own. I listen to the Writer's Almanac every day. In many ways, your soothing voice and gentle words have followed me all the days of my life. I have dwelt in the house of public radio my whole life long. Your work has been a source of comfort and inspiration to me since I was a small child.

That is why your recent article was particularly dismaying and disappointing to me. I am not angry about what you wrote, Mr. Keillor, just very, very hurt.

In one of your stories, you describe a young man who is a dancer in New York City. In this story, you describe how much easier his life would be if he were desperately attracted to the woman who shared his apartment. But he is not attracted to women. You go on to say, "his life would also have been easier if he were a lawyer." Like that dancer in New York, that young man of whom you spoke with such affection and compassion, I did not choose to be the woman that I am today. I have, however, come to a level of acceptance about it, and to realize that I deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.

As I grew into a young woman, I discovered some things about myself that have been very hard for me -- and many people -- to accept. I am a bisexual woman, and I am a witch. Neither of these things did I choose for myself, anymore than I chose to be born in California and raised on the East Coast. These labels do not define me, but they are a part of my identity, just as much as my blue eyes and my talent for writing and my love for Prairie Home Companion.

After leaving the Catholic Church of my birth, and after many years of practicing my beliefs in private and seeking a spiritual home, I became a member of First Parish Cambridge. I joined a Unitarian Universalist congregation because it was the only church that would take a witch as a member. I discovered for the first time in my life a vibrant, organized, active community of people with deeply held beliefs that I shared. These beliefs and their creed may be different than yours, but they are beliefs nonetheless. They deserve to be treated with the same respect as those of mainstream Christianity, of Judaism, of Islam.

UUs care passionately about things like social justice, the inherent worth and dignity of all people, the interconnected web of existence, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning. Do not mistake our aversion to written dogma for wishy-washiness. Wishy-washy people do not work for the survival of Jews in Nazi-occupied Germany (http://www.uusc.org/history). They do not face criminal charges to keep people from dying of thirst in the desert (http://www.uuctucson.org/index.php/social-action/no-more-deaths-no-mas-muertes.html). They do not face violence and death in their own houses of worship (http://www.knoxnews.com/news/news/local/knoxville-unitarian-church-shooting/).

You accuse us of having no creed. Our seven principles and six sources are even easier to understand than the Nicene or Apostle's creed. Here they are for your reading pleasure: http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml

One of the most hurtful things you said in your article, Mr. Keillor, was that Christmas is a Christian holiday, and that if we don't like it, we should go off and celebrate another one. Christmas is a part of my cultural heritage, and I refuse to abandon it to bigots and dogmatists. If you go back and read your history, you will see that most of modern Christmas traditions date back only to the Victorian era. Good Yankee Congregationalists and Calvinists like the Rev. Lyman Beecher refused to celebrate Christmas because there was no Biblical evidence to suggest that Jesus was born around the time of the Winter Solstice. Church reformers also repudiated the pagan origins of most of the Christmas traditions, including the Christmas tree, Christmas caroling, the exchange of gifts, and the Yule log. Modern Christians have similar protestations about Halloween (see here: http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/halloween.html)

According to many Biblical scholars, it's much more likely that Jesus was born in the spring. But there's already another big Christian festival at that time of year. Perhaps you've heard of it. It's called Easter (from the German Ostara), a holiday that, like its pagan predecessors, celebrates life, death, and rebirth with the coming of the spring. Easter is also full of traditions that date back to its earlier pagan origins. I, for one, am not going to deny my children the pleasure of an Easter egg hunt in the service of theological purity.

Religion, like all of human experience and culture, is constantly evolving. As a Protestant, you should be well aware of how much your version of Christianity differs from that of Rome. And religious tolerance has always been one of the bedrocks upon which American society has rested. Please don't fall into the same trap that Rev. Fred Phelps did (http://www.godhatesfags.com/). As a Christian who celebrates the birth of your Lord Savior Jesus Christ, you are no doubt aware of these words from the Book of Peter:

Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous. Do not repay evil for evil or abuse for abuse; but, on the contrary, repay with a blessing.
1 Peter 3:8-9

I will not repay your insult with more insults, but this blessing and this prayer: that you be treated with the same kindness, tolerance, and forbearance that all beings deserve.

Mr. Keillor, I am writing you this letter because I wanted to let you know about the long-standing relationship I have had with your work and your show. I realize that this is a one-sided relationship. You have never met me. We have never been friends. And yet we still have a relationship. I would hate to see that relationship damaged because of a few careless words. I find it difficult to listen to the Writer's Almanac these days. I'm not sure that I will be able to continue my support of Prairie Home Companion. I have done what I can to repair this relationship. I can only hope that you care enough about your fans that you will do what you can to repair it as well.

I wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

In love and compassion,

Frances Donovan

The Sacred

  • Nov. 9th, 2009 at 10:24 AM
eye

...but the car kept coming up,
      the car in motion
music filling it, and sometimes one other person

who understood the bright altar of the dashboard

- From "The Sacred" by Stephen Dunn, as heard on The Writer's Almanac

Tuesday five

  • Sep. 30th, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Sad Purple Fairy

  1. Had a good, productive day at the (home) office. Killer cramps meant I didn't feel like a human being until around 10am, but thanks to the miracle of technology (if we don't understand how it works, does that mean it's magic?) I still started working before 8am. Of course, now I feel like I need to get just one more thing done before I can go, er, home.

  2. I've lined up an editor for my new first chapbook. This is good because it'll never get published unless I have deadlines. I can has deadlines?

  3. From our email exchange about the book:

    ME: I'd like to get it out before December and the holidays -- it might make a nice gift to some folks, unless it's super-tacky to send off your own poetry as a gift.

    HIM: I don't think it's at all tacky - either that, or I'm the tackiest mofo around.



  4. I'm leading the annual open circle of the Women's Sacred Circle at First Parish Cambridge (UU). This is, I believe, my second or third year on the leadership council for the group. Our official church liason/fearless leader has been in the job for about three years. No one wants to take it over from her (especially me) because it involves sitting through interminable Program Council meetings where they debate things like where the table for the group raising money for the thing should go next Sunday. She's very happy, however, that I've taken over most of the planning of the actual open circle. We only open to new members once a year. Usually we get a pretty sizable number of newcomers in October, but not everyone stays. It's always a challenge making sure everyone feels welcome. By the end of the year, we all know each other really well. But it's only this year that I really feel like I'm deeply rooted in the group. It's like all kinds of family: sometimes they annoy the crap out of you, but you still love them.


  5. Army Guy, [info]mellowtron, and I went to see Neal Stephenson read from his new book Anathem last Saturday. The Harvard Bookstore put it on -- in my church, because my church is just that cool. I was the first one up in line and asked him a question about Snow Crash. In the back the book, he mentions that the book was originally conceived as a graphic novel and I wanted to know whether he'd ever done any other collaborations. In short, no.

    The crowd was super-nerd-a-licious, which made the premise of the book (a monastic "mathic" order that studiously avoids exposure to ephemeral technology in pursuit of more eternal truths) that much more apropos. Behind me, kids were talking about Facebook and Netflix. Ten years ago it would have been about iVillage and About.com.

    Two great questions: one about some kind of nerd religious movement called "The Singularity." Apparently, some dude is predicting there will be a Rapture of the Nerds, where we all transcend our bodies and upload ourselves into entirely digital spaces. Sounds about as likely as Gabriel blowin' his horn and the dead rising up from their graves. What I want to know is, who's going to maintain the servers? The rest of us, I guess, who'll be stuck behind reading old books and playing with ham radios.

    Best question EVAR, though: "If you had to choose just one, would you teach your children to type or to write cursive?" The poor man was stumped. For a minute. Then he chose cursive, "on the theory that handwriting recognition will improve enough to recognize cursive."

    My cursive is completely illegible. Of course, so is most of my printed handwriting.


Han Solo, don't fuck with me
From John Scalzi:

Honestly, I no longer know what to make of John McCain anymore. A man who has readily admitted he doesn’t know much about the economy makes a big show of bringing his presidential campaign to a grinding halt to rush to Washington to fix it, which seems a bit like a NASA auto pool mechanic declaring to all and sundry that he’s going to stopped making oil changes to rush to Florida to consult on the Shuttle.
[...]
he also suggests we cancel (or, “delay”) the presidential debate on Friday, and maybe the VP debate next week. You know, just to be sure we’re all focused on the economy, instead of, frivolous things, such as the fact that John McCain apparently hasn’t had a useful thought about the national economy since he married a heiress, and that Sarah Palin can’t be trusted to extemporize [...] without appearing like she’s [shoving her hockey-mom pumps down her throat].

Link to Scalzi's full post


And via [info]yesthatthom, some Youtube videos of Letterman catching McCain in one WHOPPER of a lie. "Could McCain be so out of touch that he didn't realize that Couric, also on CBS, would be interviewing him in the very same building?"

Short versions, long versions, all funny-as-hell versions (when did Letterman switch over from the nutty younger late-night guy in a sweater to the Johnny Carson of our generation?). Watch them all here: http://yesthattom.livejournal.com/879499.html

On a more religious note, I can't get the Family Research Council (a.k.a. family fearmongers' council) to take me off their damn spam list. What began as keeping track of what the other side was up to has turned into a daily dose of hate in my inbox. Faithful America is a nice antidote -- a PAC that reclaims religious values from the far right.

I got fed up enough to send a strongly worded response to a particularly egregious email full of lies and half-truths. I'm sure it's falling on deaf ears over in Tony's inbox, though. Maybe it will amuse you, dear Intarwebs.

From a personal appeal for dough from Tony Perkins, President of this "Christian" organization:

I want you to hear something a California pastor said to me recently:

"If we lose, we go to jail."

It's just that simple, says Pastor Jim Garlow--if marriage loses in California, religious liberties everywhere will be next. [Funny thing, that: here in Sodom Massachusetts, religious liberties seem to be alive and well for Christians, Muslims, Jews, pagans, and others alike, gays can get married, and marriage as we know it is still intact.]

The fight for marriage in the states is our first priority.

But we can't take our eye off Washington, D.C. politicians. Your support is vital as we stand up to liberals who want to criminalize your religious speech . . . threaten the religious liberties of employers . . . silence conservative and Christian broadcasting . . . raise taxes . . . and impose taxpayer funding of abortion and embryonic stem cell research.


And my response:


Tony, this is an incredibly offensive letter. Christians have never
been sent to jail in this country for practicing the teachings of
Christ. Untold numbers of homosexuals, though, have been rounded up by
police, beaten, raped, and returned to the street without charges ever
being placed. Recognizing a loving, stable union between two people is
not an affront to marriage. Preaching hatred and intolerance is,
however, an affront to Christ's teachings. Shame on you, and shame on
your organization. Turn off your computer and read your bible.

If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have
love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.
If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all
knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do
not have love, I am nothing.
And if I give all my possessions to feed the poor, and if I
surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me
nothing.

1 CORINTHIANS 13:1–3 (NASB)

Paganism on Speaking of Faith

  • Jun. 15th, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Girlscout
Army Guy called me from the road to tell me about a show playing right now on WBUR: an interview of an ecologist and pagan on the public radio show Speaking of Faith. It focuses on paganism, with an interview of Adrian Ivakhiv, an assistant professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Vermont and author of Claiming Sacred Ground: Pilgrims and Politics at Glastonbury and Sedona. I'm listening to it now and I'm impressed with Ivakhiv's historically grounded view of paganism -- what we know of the old folk traditions, what has survived, and what the neopagan movement is about today.

You can read about and listen to the show here:

http://speakingoffaith.publicradio.org/programs/pagans/

I'm also glad that this interview underscores the deep respect for the earth, a desire to preserve the earth's beauty, that is central to pagan spirituality. Not all pagans are environmentalists, and not all environmentalists are pagans, but in terms of my own deeply held, spiritual values, one flows naturally from the other.

Invocation of the Goddess

  • May. 7th, 2008 at 8:36 AM
eye
Great Mother Goddess, help me through this day
Great Mother Goddess, keep my eyes on the task before me
Great Mother Goddess, let me release the nonessential
Great Mother Goddess, teach me love and compassion
Great Mother Goddess, open my heart to your abundance
Great Mother Goddess, I am your child and your companion
Great Mother Goddess, remind me I am being taken care of
Great Mother Goddess, I am a lily in your eyes
Great Mother Goddess, I am a rose before you
Great Mother Goddess, I am an oak, I am ironwood
Great Mother Goddess, I am all the creatures of the forest
Great Mother Goddess, I am the bugs crunching within the soil
Great Mother Goddess, I am the slime mold that dismantles the dead
Great Mother Goddess, I am the silence of the frozen winter
Great Mother Goddess, I am the secret germ in the seed
Great Mother Goddess, I am the silence of a swan gliding over still water
Great Mother Goddess, I am a cherry tree in blossom
Great Mother Goddess, I am an apple tree bearing fruit
Great Mother Goddess, I am a hive of bees making honey
Great Mother Goddess, I am a bear moving deliberate through the trees
Great Mother Goddess, I am a wild mustang in the desert
Great Mother Goddess, I am a cow grazing in a green paddock,
Great Mother Goddess, I am a hen laying eggs in the barn
Great Mother Goddess, I am a tadpole wriggling in a pool
Great Mother Goddess, I am a serpent flying through the endless sea
Great Mother Goddess, I am your child, I am your child, rocked to sleep in your lap
I am blessed, I am blessed, I am blessed

Frances Donovan
May 7, 2008
Rev. May 23, 2008
Note: Cf. shamanic invocations of the Celts before battle and the work of the bard Taliesin.

Wither hijab?

  • Apr. 28th, 2008 at 3:26 PM
eye
In a recent article in Bitch magazine, a woman suggested that the media actually consult Muslim women when covering controversy about the wearing of headscarves (hijab) in public.

Shibhana Mir gives 17 reasons why women wear headscarves on the blog Religious Dispatches.

Can't say I agree with all 17 reasons (does a woman really need to cover her hair to keep from getting harassed?), but many of them do make a good deal of sense -- especially the argument that wearing hijab enables Muslims to gain greater visibility, both to each other and within mainstream society.

Link via the the spirituality blog.
And I still want to smack a bitch
[info]tammy212 articulates in a full-of-awesome way what I've been too busy with my own little dramas to say. About the Texas raid on the Fundamentalist Mormon compound in which over 100 women and children were "seized." More info here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89395841 or google "mormon texas polygamist raid" or some combination thereof.

From [info]tammy212's post:

So feminists have achieved their revolution? Women are equal? Our rights have been won in our enlightened country?

Apparently not as far as law enforcement in Texas is concerned.

...

It was bad enough that this "lead" was given to law enforcement a year ago. But today it comes out, according to MSNBC.com, that Schleichler Counter Sheriff David Doran has had an informant in the church compound for four years. He has known that underaged girls were being forced into marriage against state and national law for four years. But this upstanding representative of the public's civil rights has this to say:

"We are aware that this group is capable of (sexually abusing young girls)," Doran said. "But there again, this is the United States. We are going to respect them. We're not going to violate their civil rights until we get an outcry. I've said that from day one."


There, you see? Forced marriage is only important if women and girls living in a compound under the control of men complain to outside authorities. Otherwise they should just be left to the control of their men, who today are weeping as the chapel where the marriage beds are is being searched. I would like to give each of those men a red-hot iron handkerchief for their tears.

This is the United States. We are going to respect the rights of adults to force sexual behavior on underaged girls. We are going to respect the rights of men to hold women and girls captive. Have I got that right?

I am too angry to breathe. The next person who tells me we women have it made will be lucky to walk away without my teeth in his/her throat.



This story was way too close to an account of a fundamentalist Mormon compound in Sheri Tepper's The Gate to Women's Country. I don't agree with all of Tepper's ideas, especially those around social engineering, but her account of a post-apocalyptic society and the different ways that surviving groups and cultures deal with gender issues is compelling and a great read.

It chills me to think, though, that what happened in her fictional, dystopian account, was actually happening in Texas. Here. In this day and age. While I run around being all sexually liberated and economically free and stuff.

So you can take that "strident feminist" crap and shove it up your ass.
Han Solo, don't fuck with me
I came across the activist group Faithful America a while ago and really appreciate the message they stand for. Political discourse in this country around religion has been very much shaped by the religious right. Faithful America aims to reshape the discourse to include members of more liberal religious traditions. Their latest campaign is to shape some of the debate happening during this year's presidential campaign. There's a "compassion forum" live on CNN this Sunday at 8pm. You should vote on which issue to have the candidates address: click here to do that.

Whenever I talk to someone new, I feel self-conscious saying things like "I know her from church" or "I do lay ministry," because as soon as people hear the word "church" slip from my lips I know they're making all kinds of assumptions about my religion, my politics, and my beliefs. For the record (are the new viewers gone yet?), I have been a practicing witch for more than a decade. Most of that time I spent as a solitary practitioner, although I did study with a coven in Connecticut and also ran a website for About.com on the subject that included virtual ritual in chat rooms (not to mention mountains and mountains of emails, and the time-sink-hole morass of bitchy pagans forum). I belong to First Parish Cambridge, a Unitarian Universalist church in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Years before I attended a Sunday service at the church, some friends of mine introduced me to the CUUPs rituals that take place on Fridays near the Sabbats of Yule, Imbolc, Ostara, and sometimes Samhain. I appreciated CUUPs's eclectic approach to pagan practice and was also impressed with the depth and breadth of knowledge possessed by the facilitators.

While the notion of a liberal religious tradition is not entirely new to me, my experience at First Parish Cambridge really was life-changing. To steal the words of my ex-girlfriend, it was an important part of my re-churching. It wasn't until Sunday services at First Parish that I actually heard the man up in the pulpit saying the exact same things I believed. The words in the hymnals weren't full of things about Jesus, only-begotten Son of the Father saving us from eternal damnation. They were about a hard-working Mother God, a loving Father God, a Spirit of Life that imbues us all. Instead of the "thou shalt nots" of the 10 Commandments, the seven principles talked about things like the inherent worth and dignity of all human beings, the importance of social justice, and the free and responsible search for truth and meaning.

People like to make fun of the UUs for having wishy-washy beliefs. At the beginning, I used to laugh along with those jokes. But I don't anymore, because I see the Unitarian Universalist movement as a group of people with very deeply held beliefs. They're beliefs not based in shame however, but in the irrepressible presence of the Divine in all aspects of existence: in human beings, in society, in the earth itself. People need deeply held beliefs to fight the genocide of the Jews in Nazi Germany, or speak out against the excesses of the McCarthy era, or take practical steps to fight racism, or get arrested protesting the genocide in the Sudan, or support the rights of gay families to equal treatment under the law.

The UU tradition allows for a heterogeneity of beliefs that includes secular humanists, deists, Buddhists, "Jew-U's", pagans, Christians, and others. It also has something sadly missing in the Catholic church of my youth: democratic governance. All members of a congregation have a say in how the congregation is run, and all matters of theology and the like come up before the General Assembly each year. Ministers don't get any more say in the running of the church than lay people.

I never expected to find a congregation that so completely shared the same views as me, and certainly not one as active, welcoming, and thriving as First Parish Cambridge. As a result, I give back a great deal to the church, both with an annual pledge and with a fair amount of lay ministry. I'm co-leading a Sunday service for Beltane this year on May 4. If you're in the neighborhood and would like to hear me preach, please come by. It's the second lay-led service the Women's Sacred Circle has done in the past 12 months, and I hope there will be more to follow.

Boston Skepchicks Celebrate Darwin Day

  • Feb. 12th, 2008 at 3:38 PM
kaylee cutiepie
Via Memoirs of a Skepchick:

Think about the last time you completely changed your world-view. I mean, completely. Like, one week you are absolutely positive the world is flat and still, and the next you realize that it’s an oblong oblate spheroid circling a flaming ball of gas in space. I’m sure many of you can think of a personal example.

It happened to me, once, and it was a little scary and overwhelming. I can’t even imagine what it might be like to not only change my own world-view, but to know that I was also changing the world-views of the rest of humanity. One week they believe their vast family of man was created by supernatural deity out of the mud, as a unique and special mirror-image of Himself — and the next week, I’m going to convince them of the beautifully stunning interrelatedness of all creatures on the planet. Talk about overwhelming.

Now here we are, 199 years after the birth of a man who did just that. About 150 years after Charles Darwin published The Origin of Species, the theory of evolution has been firmly established as a biological fact accepted by all serious scientists on the planet. Yet, we’re still fighting to convince a small but dedicated sect of fundamentalists who would rather stick their fingers in their ears and yell “la la la la la” while the rest of us learn more about the wonders of the universe. Surveys still show that many people don’t understand or accept evolution, and several viable candidates for US president admitted proudly that they don’t believe in this simple reality.

[...]
Just a reminder that I’ll see all my fellow Bostonian Evil-utionists at the Redline tonight, and all the rest of you had better be working on your Darwinian Valentines


Alas, I'll be in Central Square on a date. But Happy Birthday, Mr. Darwin. You rock, and so do the Galapagos. Oh, and just for the record, some of us who believe in God (or Goddess) also believe in evolution.

Linky

Power of prayer (not)

  • Feb. 4th, 2008 at 9:48 PM
eye
Via Memoirs of a Skepchick

I'm always a fan of things that make fun of Chick tracts.

And I still want to smack a bitch
It's true that surrendering to desire, halting the endless cycle of grasping can be freeing. But I believe it's also a kind of bondage to completely deny oneself the pleasures of the flesh. We are human beings. Part of our purpose on this earth, in this lifetime, is to delight in the human experience, to suffer in the human experience. My only issue with Buddhist thought is that the teachings often seem to encourage its followers to deny the transcendence and freedom that comes from participation in the human drama, to avoid human drama and to label it bad or wrong. I do not agree that all desire should be looked upon as suffering. Christian attitudes toward sexuality come from that same premise. Again and again, I return to the refuge of Buddhist teachings, freeing myself from the wheel of desire, fulfillment, frustration. But the warmth and solace of this freedom comes from its contrast to the other side of human experience.

It's as though the inward freedom described below is a warm room with a fire and hot cocoa, and the wheel of desire is a crazy, joyful snowball fight on a cold, sunny day. Each gives the other its sweetness.

True Freedom Is an Inward State of Being
Morality as taught by way of rules is extremely powerful and valuable
in the development of practice. It must be remembered that it, like
all the techniques in meditation, is merely a tool to enable one to
eventually get to that place of unselfishness where morality and
wisdom flow naturally. In the West, there's a myth that freedom means
free expression--that to follow all desires wherever they take one is
true freedom. In fact, as one serves the mind, one sees that following
desires, attractions, repulsions is not at all freedom, but is a kind
of bondage. A mind filled with desires and grasping inevitably entails
great suffering. Freedom is not to be gained through the ability to
perform certain external actions. True freedom is an inward state of
being. Once it is attained, no situation in the world can bind one or
limit one's freedom. It is in this context that we must understand
moral precepts and moral rules. - Jack Kornfield, Living Dharma from
Everyday Mind, edited by Jean Smith, a Tricycle book

http://www.tricycle.com/issues/2_536/dailydharma/4135-1.html
eye
Via BoingBoing:

Sex and religion prompt newspapers to censor "Opus" comic

In Opus -- Berkeley Breathed's comic strip followup to Bloom County -- the ever-changeable Lola Granola has taken up conservative Islam as her latest fad. In response, chickenshit newspaper editors across America have pulled the strip, scared of offending people with sex and religion. As Dan Gillmor writes at The Center for Citizen Media Blog, "Puritan prudishness and political cowardice: Now there's a combination that's just certain to attract more readers."

Link to BoingBoing article (and Salon opinion piece, and the actual comic)

I read this funny on Sunday at my mother's house, which is unusual in and of itself, since I find most syndicated comics to be inane. I found the comic in question sort of unsettling, mostly because any sort of humor that appears to be at the expense of a particular religious tradition skirts the edge of bad taste. But that's always been what makes Berkeley Breathed's comics so damn awesome: he's not afraid to say anything! His characters always say the most flip, off-the-cuff things. Well, they used to anyway. I heard it from someone who heard it from someone that he quit drawing Bloom County because he got tired of being such a lightning rod for political issues. But man, that shit was funny! Like the strip about how secular humanists are the devil. Or all the random references to obscure public figures like Caspar Weinberger (and in rhyme, no less!).

No doubt because he can't hang the punch lines on current events, the replacement strip Opus is less grounded in reality. As [info]dalbino83 said, "it's like Bloom County on acid." Doonesbury Boondocks, and NonSequiter are the only left-leaning syndicated comic artists out there. It almost balances out B.C., Family Circle, and Mallard Fillmore.

Psychedelia or no, I still consider Breathed one of the best--if not the best--comic artists of our generation. Hopefully, the self-censorship kerfuffle will increase his readership. And to that effect I hereby insert a hearty plug for Goodnight Opus, sure to be a hit with all former children and/or English majors. Thanks, Johnny D. Behind the iPod Nano, that was the best birthday/Christmas present evah.

Five Things

  • Aug. 22nd, 2007 at 10:36 AM
eye

  1. Good news for [info]la_directora: As evidence of a major shift in Spain's attitude toward animal rights and violence, Spain's state-run TV service has decided to stop showing bullfights at times when children might be watching. I wonder if they allow lesbian kisses? Full story from The World here. Scroll down to "Spanish TV cancels bullfight coverage"

  2. The Goddess is alive and magic is afoot. Evidence of older, female-centered rituals exist in the Islamic tradition, too. The description of Zar (or Zaar) music in the last segment of the same show listed above sounds awfully familiar. It's led by women, it builds to a fever pitch or trance, it has healing qualities, it's designed to get the participants in touch with their own spirit, or the spirits, or The Spirit. It's familiar because it's the same thing I've been doing in ritual here in the US for well over ten years. It's also similar to what I know of Sufi ritual.

    A Google search on the topic turns up mixed results. These are three I found interesting:

  3. Okay, so I really dug last night's show of the The World. There was a great story on women in combat in Iraq. The segment includes excellent interviews with a number of female soldiers profiled in Band of Sisters, a book written by journalist Kirsten Holmstedt about women in combat situation. Military law still states that women cannot fight "in combat," but as Holmstedt notes, "in Iraq, the front lines are everywhere--and everywhere in Iraq women in the U.S. military fight."


  4. Daily Dharma quote about right livelihood:

    Right Livelihood Today
    Right Livelihood appears to be harder to practice these days than in
    the time of the Buddha. The rule is still the same: Right Livelihood
    is organizing one's financial support so that it is nonabusive,
    nonexploitive, nonharming. However, these days what is abusive and
    exploitive is not necessarily self-evident. When the Buddha taught,
    unwholesome livelihood categories were easy to distinguish.
    Soldiering, keeping slaves, manufacturing weapons and intoxicants--all
    were on the proscribed list. In our time, soldiers sometimes serve as
    peacekeepers. It's hard to know the wholesomeness of all the products
    of any corporation, corporate mergers being what they are. Who knows
    what else is being manufactured by my detergent company's
    subsidiaries? . . . For me, a complete picture of wholesome Right
    Livelihood is even larger than the proscriptions that reflect external
    choices. Wholesome internal choices--healthy attitudes about one's
    work--also contribute to mental happiness and peace of mind.
    Everyone's livelihood is an opportunity for self-esteem.
    -Sylvia Boorstein, It's Easier Than You Think
    from Everyday Mind, edited by Jean Smith, a Tricycle book
    http://www.tricycle.com/issues/2_478/dailydharma/4044-1.html

    This is a question I struggle with quite a good deal. Anyone who saves for retirement by investing in mutual funds may inadvertently be funding a company that participates in icky things like warmongering or child labor. I've looked into the new lines of "socially responsible" investment funds, but find that their rate of return is less than stellar. And one still needs to wonder about who decides what company is socially responsible. They tend to be heavy on the tech stocks, which leads to extra volatility.

    Right livelihood is why I refused a gig at Raytheon, a defense contractor and pretty big employer here in the Boston area. But defense contractors often come up with new technologies that substantially improve one's quality of life--and I'm not just talking Tang. My second-generation-immigrant grandfather spent his life working at Lockheed, which makes both passenger aircraft and war planes.

    Boorstein's notion of "wholesome internal choices" is helpful. And one must be centered and well to do good effectively in the world. But it's also easy to become complacent and believe that living well and taking care of oneself is enough. It's not.



  5. I received some feedback recently regarding my communication style, which was described as "abrasive." While opportunities for self-improvement abound, I find myself caught in the same conundrum many women in business face. Early on in my career, a friend of mine suggested I read a book called Hardball for Women, which did an excellent job at helping me adapt to a culture that was originally made for men, by men, and about men--I'm talking about the business world. It helped me to understand the different ways that men and women communicate, and I began to modify my communication style as a result. But here's where the dilemma sets in: they see my tits. So they expect different things from me than they would of someone with no tits (or man-boobs). A man expresses anger or impatience, he's seen as powerful or important. A woman expresses anger or impatience, she's seen as out of control or moody. And God forbid you mention these different expectations in the actual business world! That's playing the gender card!

    The tightrope, the challenge, the opportunity for personal growth (or AFGO, as they call it in some circles), is this: to appear competent, powerful, in control, while still personable and approachable. It's fun, kids! Now you try!



Five things

  • Jul. 16th, 2007 at 11:51 PM
me smiling on Highway 1 in 2002

  1. Julia Cameron may have hit it big with The Artist's Way, but boy does her memoir Floor Sample suuuuuuck! Her choppy sentences annoy the crap out of me. I wish I could find a DVD copy of her '89 movie God's Will, but apparently they only show it at film festivals because of sound issues.
  2. I'm preaching at a lay-led service on Sunday, July 29, at 10:30 at First Parish UU in Harvard Square. You should come. We're gonna be all pagan and stuff in the meeting house. My sermon is on the topic of winnowing. 'Cause it's Lughnasadh, the grain harvest.
  3. I was working on aforementioned sermon, which is why I am awake at 12 midnight. Go to bed, me.
  4. I just discovered a new anime called Gilgamesh. The artwork is not up to Miyazaki standards and I wasn't terribly impressed with the voice acting at the beginning, but it's the storytelling that really draws you in. They're very good at the slow-reveal, a la Anne Rice. And it's got that same sort of gothic feel. Mostly in black, white, and shades of grey, with a hint of red now and again.
  5. I love Farmer's Markets. They totally rock. Given the current state of my digestion, I'm off the white stuff (wheat flour, sugar) for the time being. But oh, those fresh, ripe, sun-kissed beefsteak tomatoes and the locally grown lettuce... they're a welcome distraction from a dearth of ice cream. Dammit. Now I'm hungry. No eating. Time for bed.

Super bonus track extra: I had to upload new icons with happiness in them, because that is how I'm feeling these days, rather than snarky and sly.

If you see the Buddha, kill him (explained)

  • Jun. 18th, 2007 at 11:17 AM
And I still want to smack a bitch
I heard this saying years ago, and the explanation I got was somewhat different -- possibly because the person telling it to me was from a more warlike tradition. Yes, there are more warlike Buddhist traditions ::ducks for flames:: The explanation I heard was that if you see the Buddha on the road, it is the path you should take, and by killing him you become him. The explanation below from the Daily Dharma is related, but different. But since we're all one, I guess it doesn't really matter.
-----------------------------------------------
If You See The Buddha, Kill Him
For 300 years after Buddha's death there were no Buddha images. The
people's practice was the image of the Buddha, there was no need to
externalize it. But in time, as the practice was lost, people began to
place the Buddha outside of their own minds, back in time and space.
As the concept was externalized and images were made, great teachers
started to reemphasize the other meaning of Buddha. There is a saying:
"If you see the Buddha, kill him." Very shocking to people who offer
incense and worship before an image. If you have a concept in the mind
of a Buddha outside yourself, kill it, let it go. . . . Gotama Buddha
repeatedly reminded people that the experience of truth comes from
one's own mind.

http://www.tricycle.com/issues/2_413/dailydharma/3893-1.html

In the Morning (October)

  • May. 11th, 2007 at 5:31 AM
Girlscout
In the Morning (October)

You don’t know if these are tears of joy or fear
hovering at the back of your eyes;
here in the early morning twilight
they could be either.

You hear the honks of Canada geese
above the traffic on Mass Ave
and remember a time when you, too,
could fly above the everyday.

Gravity’s rainbow surrounds you,
but still you know the spark
of stepping off into solid air,
the flights of fancy.

Don’t fool yourself.
Your essence remains the same,
thirty-one or twelve,
tears of joy surely now,
brimming again, full—-
filled to overflowing with God’s love
for you,
for the world,
for the cracks in the pavement,
for every living berry
that will soon fall to ground.

Frances Donovan
October 2006

In the Meeting House

  • May. 11th, 2007 at 5:27 AM
eye
In the Meeting House

You suddenly find yourself replete,
brimming, a cup overflowing with—
not sorrow,
but a joyous passion that brings you to tears.
You feel yourself without skin
in a room full of strangers—
God reaches down
with Her finger of fire to brand your heart,
calling up a kind of lava that erupts
into unseemly tears,
weeping at the fullness of spirit
in music sung
by a congregation fully human.

Frances Donovan
October 2006
May 2007

In other words: this world is a gift

  • Mar. 29th, 2007 at 2:34 PM
And I still want to smack a bitch
The Suffering Itself Is Not So Bad

It is possible to take our existence as a "sacred world," to take this
place as open space rather than claustrophobic dark void. It is
possible to take a friendly relationship to our ego natures, it is
possible to appreciate the aesthetic play of forms in emptiness, and
to exist in this place like majestic kings of our own consciousness.
But to do that, we would have to give up grasping to make everything
come out the way we daydream it should. So, suffering is caused by
ignorance or ignorant grasping, or suffering exaggerated by ignorance
or ignorant grasping and clinging to our notion of what we thing
should be, is what causes the "suffering of suffering." The suffering
itself is not so bad, it's the resentment against suffering that is
the real pain.

--Allen Ginsberg, Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, Vol.
II, #1

Via Daily Dharma

Dammit. There goes my argument about why I'm not a full-on Buddhist. Because the world is a gift of the Goddess and Nirvana is not necessarily the final goal.

They're gonna take away my priestess card.

What was wild

  • Mar. 2nd, 2007 at 9:51 AM
eye
What Was Wild
As I left my daytime resting place on Vulture Peak, I saw an elephant
come up on the riverbank after its bath. A man took a hook and said to
the elephant, "Give me your foot." The elephant stretched out its
foot; the man mounted. Seeing what was wild before gone tame under
human hands, I went into the forest and concentrated on my mind.
--Dantika, in Susan Murcotts The First Buddhist Woman

Via Tricycle's Daily Dharma

More about Buddhist women here:
http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma3/women.html

Profile

eye
[info]okelle
Ceci n'est pas une femme
The Garden of Words

Advertisement

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Links

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com